A Question of War with Germany
Lansing's Memorandum of the Cabinet Meeting, 20 March,
1917
The
Cabinet Meeting of today I consider the most momentous and therefore, the most
historic of any of those which have been held since I became Secretary of
State, since it involved, unless a miracle occurs the question of war with
Germany and the abandonment of the policy of neutrality which has been pursued
for two years and a half....
The
corridors of the State Department and Executive Office swarmed with press correspondents
seeking to get some inkling of what would be done from passing officials. It
was through these eager crowds of news-gatherers that I forced my way at
half-past two Tuesday afternoon under a bombardment of questions, to which I
made no reply, and entered the Cabinet room where all the other members had
arrived.
Three
minutes later the President came in and passed to his place at the head of the
table shaking hands with each member and smiling as genially and composedly as
if nothing of importance was to be considered. Composure is a marked
characteristic of the President. Nothing ruffles the calmness of his manner or
address. It has a sobering effect on all who sit with him in council.
Excitement would seem very much out of place at the Cabinet table with Woodrow
Wilson presiding.
.
. . the President said that he desired advice from the
Cabinet on our relations with Germany and the course which should be pursued.
He began with a review of his actions up to the present time pointing out that
he had said to Congress on February 3rd that, while the announced policy of
Germany had compelled the severance of diplomatic relations, he could not bring
himself to believe that the German Government would carry it out against
American vessels, but that, if an "overt act" occurred, he would come
before them again and ask means to protect Americans on the high seas even
though he thought he possessed the constitutional power to act without
Congress. He said that the situation compelled him to do this on February 23rd
and Congress had desired to adopt the measures, which he sought, but had been
prevented, and that he had then acted on his own authority and placed armed
guards on American vessels intending to proceed to the German barred zone.
He
went on to say that he did not see from a practical point of view what else
could be done to safeguard American vessels more than had already been done
unless we declared war or declared that a state of war existed, which was the
same thing; and that the power to do this lay with Congress.
He
said that the two questions as to which he wished to be advised were --
Should
he summon Congress to meet at an earlier date than April 16th, for which he had
already issued a call?
Second.
What should he lay before Congress when it did assemble?
He
then spoke in general terms of the political situations in the belligerent
countries particularly in Russia where the revolution against the autocracy had
been successful, and in Germany where the liberal element in the Prussian Diet was
grumbling loudly against their rulers. He also spoke of the situation in this
country, of the indignation and bitterness in the East and the apparent apathy
of the Middle West.
After
the President had finished McAdoo was the first to speak. He said that war
seemed to him a certainty and he could see no reason for delay in saying so and
acting accordingly; that we might just as well face the issue and come out
squarely in opposition to Germany, whose Government represented every evil in
history; that, if we did not do so at once, the American people would compel
action and we would be in the position of being pushed forward instead of
leading, which would be humiliating and unwise. He further said that he
believed that we could best aid the Allies against Germany by standing back of
their credit, by underwriting their loans, and that they were sorely in need of
such aid. He felt, however, that we could do little else, and doubted whether
we could furnish men.
McAdoo
spoke with great positiveness in advocating an
immediate call of Congress. His voice was low and his utterance deliberate, but
he gave the impression of great earnestness.
Houston,
who followed, said that he agreed with McAdoo that it would create a most
unfortunate, if not disastrous, impression on the American public as well as in
Europe if we waited any longer to take a firm stand now that Germany had shown
her hand. He said that he doubted whether we should plan to do more than to use
our navy and to give financial aid to the Allies; that to equip an army of any
size would divert the production of our industrial plants and so cut off from
the Allies much needed supplies; and he thought that we ought to be very
careful about interfering with their efficiency. He concluded by urging the President
to summon Congress at once because he felt that a state of war already existed
and should be declared.
Redfield
followed Houston with his usual certainty of manner and vigor of expression. He
was for declaring war and doing everything possible to aid in bringing the
Kaiser to his knees. He made no points which particularly impressed me; and, as
he had so often shown his strong pro-Ally sentiments, I was sure his words made
little impression upon the President.
Baker
was the next to express an opinion and he did so with the wonderful clearness
of diction of which he is master. He said that he considered the state of
affairs called for drastic action with as little delay as possible, and that he
believed Congress should meet before April 16th. He said that the recent German
outrages showed that the Germans did not intend to modify in the least degree
their policy of inhumanity and lawlessness, and that such acts could mean only
one thing, and that was war.
Since
we were now forced into the struggle he favored entering it with all our vigor.
He advocated preparing an army at once to be sent to Europe in case the Allies
became straightened in the number of their men. He said that he believed the
very knowledge of our preparations would force the Central Powers to realize
that their cause was hopeless. He went on to discuss the details of raising,
equipping and training a large force. I followed Baker and can very naturally
remember what I said better and more fully than I can the remarks of others.
I
began with the statement that in my opinion an actual state of war existed
today between this country and Germany, but that, as the acknowledgment of such
a state officially amounted to a declaration of war, I doubted the wisdom as
well as the constitutional power of the President to announce such fact or to
act upon it; that I thought that the facts should be laid before Congress and
that they should be asked to declare the existence of a state of war and to
enact the laws necessary to meet the exigencies of the case. I pointed out that
many things could be done under our present statutes which seriously menaced
our national safety and that the Executive was powerless to prevent their being
done. I referred in some detail to the exodus of Germans from this country to
Mexico and Cuba since we severed diplomatic relations, to the activities of
German agents here, to the transference of funds by Germans to Latin American
countries, to the uncensored use of the telegraph and the mails, &c.
For
the foregoing reasons I said that I felt that there should be no delay in
calling Congress together and securing these necessary powers.
In
addition to these reasons which so vitally affected our domestic situation I
said that the revolution in Russia, which appeared to be successful, had
removed the one objection to affirming that the European War was a war between
Democracy and Absolutism; that the only hope of a permanent peace between all
nations depended upon the establishment of democratic institutions throughout
the world; that no League of would be of value if a powerful autocracy was a
member, and that no League of Peace would be necessary if all nations were
democratic; and that in going into the war at this time we could do more to
advance the cause of Democracy than if we failed to show sympathy with the
democratic powers in their struggle against the autocratic government of
Germany.
I
said that the present time seemed to me especially propitious for action by us
because it would have a great moral influence in Russia, because it would
encourage the democratic movement in Germany, be cause
it would put new spirit in the Allies already flushed with recent military
successes and because it would put an end to the charges of vacillation and
hesitation, which were becoming general and bring the people solidly behind the
President....
The
President said that he did not see how he could speak of a war for Democracy or
of Russia's revolution in addressing Congress. I replied that I did not
perceive any objection but in any event I was sure that he could do so
indirectly by attacking the character of the autocratic government of Germany
as manifested by its deeds of inhumanity, by its broken promises, and by its
plots and conspiracies against this country.
To
this the President only answered, "Possibly."
Whether
the President was impressed with the idea of a general indictment of the German
Government I do not know. I felt strongly that to go to war solely because
American ships had been sunk and Americans killed would cause debate, and that
the sounder basis was the duty of this and every other democratic nation to
suppress an autocratic government like the German because of its atrocious
character and because it was a menace to the national safety of this country
and of all other countries with liberal systems of government. Such an
arraignment would appeal to every liberty-loving man the world over. This I
said during the discussion, but just when I do not remember.
When
I had finished, Secretary Wilson in his usual slow but emphatic way said:
"Mr. President, I think we must recognize the fact that Germany has made
war upon this country and, therefore, I am for call ing
Congress together as soon as possible. I have reached this conviction with very
great reluctance, but having reached it I feel that we should enter the war
with the determination to employ all our resources to put an end to Prussian
rule over Germany which menaces human liberty and peace all over the world. I
do not believe we should employ half-measures or do it half-heartedly."
Gregory,
who had been listening with much attention although on account of his deafness
I am sure only heard his neighbors at the table, gave it as his opinion that it
was useless to delay longer, that the possibility of peace with Germany was a
thing of the past, and that he was in favor of assembling Congress as soon as
possible, of enacting all necessary legislation, and of pursuing as aggressive
action toward Germany as we were able. He went on to speak of German intrigues
here, of the departure of German reservists and of the helplessness of his
Department under existing laws. He said that every day 's
delay increased the danger and Congress ought to be called on to act at once.
After
Gregory had given his views the President said, "We have not yet heard
from Burleson and Daniels."
Burleson
spoke up immediately and said: "Mr. President, I am in favor of calling
Congress together and declaring war, and when we do that I want it to be
understood that we are in the war to the end, that we will do everything we can
to aid the Allies and weaken Germany with money, munitions, ships, and men, so
that those Prussians will realize that, when they made war on this country,
they woke up a giant which will surely defeat them. I would authorize the issue
of five billions in bonds and go the limit." He stopped a moment and then
added, "There are many personal reasons why I regret this step, but there
is no other way. It must be carried through to the bitter end."
The
President then turned his head toward Daniels who sat opposite Burleson and
said: "Well, Daniels?" Daniels hesitated a moment as if weighing his
words and then spoke in a voice which was low and trembled with emotion. His
eyes were suffused with tears. He said that he saw no other course than to
enter the war, that do what we would it seemed bound to come, and that,
therefore, he was in favor of summoning Congress as soon as possible and
getting their support for active measures against Germany.
Burleson
had at previous meetings resisted an aggressive policy toward Germany, and he
had, as late as the Cabinet meeting on Friday, the 16th, advocated very
earnestly taking a radical stand against Great Britain on account of detention
of the mails. Whenever I had called attention to the illegal acts of Germany he
would speak of British wrong doings, I felt sure that he did this to cause a
diversion of attention from the German violations of law. Possibly I misjudged
him, and there was no such motive. His words at this meeting indicated hostility
to Germany and a desire for drastic action, so I may have been mistaken.
As
for Daniels his pacifist tendencies and personal devotion to Mr. Bryan and his
ideas were well known. It was, therefore, a surprise to us all when he
announced himself to be in favor of war. I could not but wonder whether he
spoke from conviction or because he lacked strength of mind to stand out
against the united opinion of his colleagues. I prefer to believe the former
reason, though I am not sure.
The
President said, as Daniels ceased speaking: "Everybody has spoken but you,
Lane."
Lane
answered that he had nothing to add to what had been said by the other members
of the Cabinet, with whom he entirely agreed as to the necessity of summoning
Congress, declaring war and obtaining powers. He reviewed some of the things
which had been said but contributed no new thought. He emphasized particularly
the intensity of public indignation against the Germans and said that he felt
that the people would-force us to act even if we were unwilling to do so....
When
at: last every Cabinet officer had spoken and all had expressed the opinion
that war was inevitable and that Congress ought to be called in extraordinary
session as soon as possible, the President in his cool, unemotional way said
"Well, gentlemen, I think that there is no doubt as to what your advice
is. I thank you."
The
President, during the discussion or at the close, gave no sign what course he
would adopt. However as we were leaving the room he called back Burleson and me
and asked our views as to the time of calling a session if he so decided. After
some discussion we agreed that to prepare the necessary legislation for
submission to Congress would take over a week and that, therefore, Monday,
April 2nd, would be the earliest day Congress could conveniently be summoned . I asked the President if he would issue a
proclamation that afternoon so it would appear in the morning papers on
Wednesday. He replied smilingly: "Oh, I think I will sleep on it."
Thus ended a Cabinet meeting the influence of which may
change the course of history and determine the destinies of the United States
and possibly of the world. The possible results are
almost inconceivably great. I am sure that every member of the Cabinet felt the
vital importance of the occasion and spoke with a full realization of the grave
responsibility which rested upon him as he advised the President to adopt a
course which if followed can only mean open and vigorous war against the Kaiser
and his Government. The solemnity of the occasion as one after another spoke
was increasingly impressive and showed in every man's face as he rose from the
council table and prepared to leave the room. Lane, Houston and Redfield,
however, did not hide their gratification, and I believe we all felt a deep
sense of relief that not a dissenting voice had been raised to break the
unanimity of opinion that there should be no further parley or delay. The ten councillors of the President had spoken as one, and he --
well, no one could be sure that he would echo the same opinion and act
accordingly.